The purpose of the above section is
to demonstrate rough equivalencies of
packages in terms of cost.
* Escort Direct Wire more closely
approximates the direct wire kit
provided by Valentine and is available
only from Escort. Both Bel and Escort
offer a direct wire kit that includes a
remote display module inline for $29.95.
** Power Cords of the Bel and Escort
were noticeably longer than the standard
coiled-cord of the Valentine which
tended to place less strain on them when
mounting high on the windshield.
*** The European Adaptor is an Escort
product - available online.
*** The Travel Case is not as diminutive
as the Valentine case. Escort offers a
soft leather carrying case for $12.00
and Bel offers their carrying case for
$13.95. The supplied case from Escort
appears to be somewhat higher in quality
than that of the Bel, although it was
larger in size.
We especially liked the Valentine
carrying case. It is a zipped hard-shell design
and has a curvaceous shape that lends
itself to easy storage and it is a
highly recommended if you are interested
in providing protection to your
investment regardless of the brand
detector you purchase – it serves
equally well – although the Escort’s
longer length makes for a tight fit.
Build Quality
The build quality of each of these
detectors is impressive - the Valentine
One being the most so. It appears
to be the “tank” of the bunch with its
“box-like” magnesium case. Both
the RX65 and 8500 X50 are also well
built and the controls of all three
brands are of the highest quality in
feel.
The V1 appeared to be most resistant to
scuffs and minor dings and its metal
case serves to further isolate/shield
the electronics.
Display
Brightness Levels
Of the three radar detectors tested, the
Bel RX65 Pro easily had the most
readable display at its maximum bright
settings, followed by both Valentines,
and then the 8500 X50. The display
brightness differences only became
apparent in a direct comparison and all
were more than adequate.
The Bel Rx65 Pro and Escort 8500 X50
each had three brightness levels (min,med,max)
in addition to a dark mode which proved
to be very convenient when we intended
to reduce unwanted attention to
ourselves at night. The X50’s display
has the additional ability
[programmatically] to be completely
turned off during operation.
Bel RX65, Escort 8500
X50 (Red), V1 v1.8 /w POP2, K40 On
Steering Column
Bel RX65, Escort
X50 (Red), Valentine V1 at Night
Both the
X50’s and RX65 lighter adapters have an
alert lamp built-in that illuminates
during an encounter regardless of the
display settings.
The Valentine One only offers a "dark"
mode when used in combination with its
accessory remote display unit which is
not included although this detector has
an auto-dimming function on the primary
LED which varies brightness in different
lighting conditions.
Information Conveyed
The Valentine One is limited in its
display (relative to the other two)
because of the utilization of a single
LED, whose primary purpose is to display
the number of "bogeys" (concurrent radar
sources) that one encounters. Band
identification is performed by four
single LEDs that alert to four bands, X,
K, Ka, and Laser. Personally we think
the band identifiers are somewhat
superfluous given the superior audio
tone quality and that clear visual
identification is only possible during
the day and only after close scrutiny.
Both the RX65 and X50 allow for three
different display modes - two of which are
virtually identical in nature –
radar band id, followed with signal
strength bar meter in standard mode and
radar band id, followed by actual
frequency (although we' re not completely sure of their absolute accuracy, as they
never agreed).
The third display
mode approximates the behavior of the V1 in
that the detectors can display multiple
radar sources concurrently along with
their relative strength levels. As we
got comfortable with the operation of
both the RX65 and X50, we preferred
using this mode as
multiple radar sources are easily
identified at a glance.
Utility
The displays of both the RX65 and the
X50 allow for very easy programming
without reference to a manual.
The RX65 has the additional capability
to quickly familiarize its user with the
majority of alerts and signal gradients
both with audio and visual demonstration
- a very nice touch, indeed - through the
use of a tutorial mode that is entered
during the power-up sequence.
We believe both the Escort 8500 X50 and
the Valentine One do not
lend themselves as well to right-hand drive usage as
the display is angled somewhat to face
the left requiring proper placement to
be to the right of the driver (center
windshield) for easiest viewing.
In right-handed drive scenarios, if the
radar detector were mounted at this
location, the display would face away
from the driver making it harder to view
at a glance (more so with the X50).
If one were to place the detector to the
right of the driver, it would have to be
mounted on the extreme right side of the
vehicle which would likely undermine
rear sensitivity to both radar and laser
given the likelihood of an obstructed
line-of-sight to the rear.
As the Bel
RX65 Pro has a flat
face, it would work equally
well in either a left or right-hand drive
scenario.
Video/Audio Clips (DivX
Codec):
Tutorial Mode of Beltronics RX65 Pro (Hi Bandwidth)
Tutorial Mode of Beltronics RX65 Pro (Med Bandwidth)
Alert Volume
The Bel Rx65 Pro had the best (loudest) volume
as compared to the other two detectors.
The Valentine One was a very close second and
the Escort 8500 X50 trailed in this
regard even when its volume level was
set to “Loud” (maximum)
programmatically. Both the Bel and the
Valentine had the greater ability to
cut through the music we were playing.
If you are driving to music with the
Escort 8500 X50, you’ll have to be a bit
more attentive. We prefer the simplicity
and the effectiveness of the RX65 and
would like to see the X50’s two volume
ranges combined and then expanded upon
to be more in line with the other detectors.
The older Valentine V1.7's volume was
similar in level to the Escort 8500 X50.
The Beltronics RX65 Pro has the ability
to have its volume changed remotely
through the use of its power-cord so
changes can be easily made without
reaching or even taking your eyes off of the
road.
Video/Audio Clips (DivX
Codec):
Remote Volume Adjustment of Beltronics
RX65 Pro (Hi Bandwidth)
Remote Volume Adjustment of Beltronics
RX65 Pro (Med Bandwidth)
Alert Tone Distinction / Band
Identification
We believe both the V1 and the RX65
excel in this regard closely followed by
the 8500 X50.
Perhaps it’s due, in part, to the
history I have with driving with the V1
over the years, but I feel that the
distinct tones are one of the really
strong attributes of the V1 - it’s very
simple and easy to remember.
Beep – X
Braap - K - Band
Braap-Braap - Ka Band (I personally love
this tone, but not the source of
it!)
European Siren - Laser
The Bel RX65 Pro also had nice tonal
quality and the added ability of voice
band-id supplementation – which we
warmed up to.
Whirl – X Band
High Pitched Beep – Ku Band
Rasp – K Band
Gurgle – Ka Band, POP
High Pitched Gurgle – Laser
Along with the tones, the volume levels
obtainable with both, allow for rapid
communication to the driver.
After we got used to the RX65's alerts,
we actually found that may be more
consistently identifiable - especially
at mid-low volumes and/or when
accompanied by music. In these
situations, the Valentine's X and K
alerts can be confused with one another
- particularly when they are brief in
nature. The Bel's tone's remained
distinctive even at lower volume levels.
The X50 had similar tones to the RX65
but was somewhat muted, in comparison,
making its audio a little less distinct
relative to the other two radar
detectors.
Both the Bel RX65 Pro and the Escort
8500 X50 have the ability to alert to
POP K/Ka with a separate alert/display.
The Valentine does not specifically
identify POP radar usage - alerting,
instead, with standard K/Ka band
warning tones. This is somewhat
unfortunate, as Mr. Valentine has
historically voiced concerns as to the
reliability of the MPH Bee III in POP
mode. It would be nice to provide
that extra bit of information to
Valentine owners who are targeted by the
MPH Bee III, even at the expense of an
occasional POP false.
Video/Audio
Clips (DivX
Codec):
Order: Valentine v1.8 /w POP2, Escort
8500 X50, Bel RX65 Pro
Power On Self Test Comparison Without
Music (Hi Bandwidth)
Power On Self Test Comparison With Music
(Med Bandwidth)
Power On Self Test Comparison Without
Music (Hi Bandwidth)
Power On Self Test Comparison With Music
(Med Bandwidth)
of
Freddy Fender
Beltronics RX65 Pro
Power On Self Test (Hi Bandwidth)
Power On Self Test (Med Bandwidth)
Escort 8500 X50 (Red)
Power On Self Test (Hi Bandwidth)
Power On Self Test (Med Bandwidth)
Valentine One (V1) v1.8 w/POP2
Power On Self Test (Hi Bandwidth)
Power On Self Test (Med Bandwidth)
Alert Gradient (Audio Signal Strength
Meter)
The "alert gradient" as it is described
in the V1's manual is the audio
equivalent of a signal strength meter.
Here, both Valentine Ones excelled, with
the best audio gradient ramp-up /
ramp-down followed
very closely by the Escort 8500 X50.
When approaching a radar source, it is
essential that the driver be accurately
alerted to the strength of the source. This way the driver will know whether or
not they're actually in position that
their speed can be determined by the
radar operator. When either the V1 or
the X50 is really close to a radar
source, the detectors will alert with a
solid tone - the equivalence of having
the signal strength meter pegged to the
max.
The Bel unit never reaches a solid tone
- making it more difficult to ascertain
the severity of the threat level when up
close to the radar source by audio tone
alone. The standard and threat display
modes, however, offset this behavior,
with clear visual signal
strength meters.
Alert Tone Muting
Both the Rx65 Pro and the 8500 X50 had
an auto-muting capability that was
entirely satisfactory and we felt no
need to make any changes. The Valentine
provides two volume controls so that its
owner can establish the preferred muting
levels. I must tell you that after
owning three Valentines (v1.6, v1.7,
and v1.8) over the course of more than a
decade I have yet to really figure out how to
set the muting levels. I would much
prefer that they adopt an approach like
Escort and Bel - simple and effective in
operation.
Size
In this instance size does matter [and
smaller is better, in our opinion] and
the Bel excels in this regard as
compared to the other two as it has a
very nice diminutive shape that is
streamlined in its appearance.
We felt
the 8500 X50 was a bit long (in
comparison) which impacted, somewhat,
the ability for placement - particularly
with windshields that have a pronounced
curve to them (like that of the BMW Z4)
and it tended to bounce a bit more when
traveling over uneven road surfaces.
The Valentine One, although shorter than
the X50, felt bulkier given its
dimensions which are more like a small
brick. When compared to earlier versions
of itself (V1.6 & V1.7) , its reduced
size was more apparent.
Although compact is nice, in deference
to the Valentine, the larger
sizes allow the V1s to house, what
appears to be, somewhat larger antennae
than the others. This likely
enhances the V1s' ability to see
off-axis weak signals more readily as
well. (More about this later)
Ultimately, though, we're not talking huge
disparities here.
Adhesion to Windshield / Suction-Cup
Bracket / Clip
Both the RX65 Pro and the Escort 8500
X50 have dual-suction cup windshield
mounting brackets that really adhere to
the windshield in a variety of
temperature conditions and allows for
ultra-quick detector
mounting/dismounting.
The Valentine’s dual-suction cup
mounting bracket had an occasional
difficulty in attaching itself or
staying completely attached to the
windshield in cold temperatures (like
winter mornings in PA). And this
occurred without the detector mounted. The
mounting / dismounting of the detector
[to the bracket] required a bit more
care as compared to the other two
detectors. The Valentine was the only
detector, though, that was supplied with
a visor mounting clip.
Programming Ease / Capability
Both the Bel and the Escort excel in
this area. Given their ease of use,
either of these detectors is easily
programmed in the field without
requiring reference to a manual or to
the little programming card that is
provided.
Programming can be easily performed
during operation with a push-button
combination, both detectors auto exit
the programming mode and return to
normal operation after about eight
seconds of being left untouched.
We came across an undocumented
programming tip with the Bel RX65 – if
one presses the pwr button, programming
mode can be exited immediately and the
detector will return to normal
operation. The speed at which one can
program the RX65 is impressive along
with its responsiveness. In comparison
the 8500 X50 feels a little sluggish when
stepping through the programming. The
RX65 also retains the ability to alert
to a threat during programming as well,
a nice feature, indeed.
Another nice feature of both the Bel and
the Escort units was the ability to
perform a quick factory reset with a
power-up push-button sequence.
It essential to note that both the
Escort 8500 X50 and the Bel RX65 Pro
default settings have POP reception
disabled.
The Valentine One, in comparison, feels
a little like something from the 70s
when it comes to programming. The single
LED display and single push-button knob
serve as the limiting factors here. I
would not recommend programming this
unit without reference to the
programming manual, which can be
inconvenient if one is on the road.
Further, the manual (as of late December
'04) did not contain a reference to the
latest programming feature - the "J"
function nor was it documented on the
website.
We had to place a phone call to
tech support to get the info on this
latest feature. We would like to see the
Valentine come with a quick reference /
programming guide and/or the programming
procedures printed on the bottom of the
detector to simplify programming in the
field. To our knowledge, there is no
quick reset mechanism available on the
V1. Unlike the other two
detectors, the default settings have POP
reception enabled.
In the meantime, we recommend printing
the online programming guide provided
online at Valentine’s website at this
URL:
http://www.valentine1.com/lab/MikesLabRpt3.asp.
Be mindful that it does not contain, as
of 07 Feb 05, any reference to the new
“J” function which turns on/off the POP
features.
Video/Audio
Clips (DivX
Codec):
Programming the Beltronics RX65 Pro (Hi
Bandwidth)
Programming the Beltronics RX65 Pro (Med
Bandwidth)
Programming the Escort 8500 X50 (Red, Hi
Bandwidth)
Programming the Escort 8500 X50 (Red,
Med Bandwidth)
Programming the Valentine One v1.8 w/POP2
(Hi Bandwidth)
Programming the Valentine One v1.8 w/POP2
(Lo Bandwidth)
Real-World Performance / The Drive
Our Test Vehicle (Western Route)
We selected a test vehicle that would
serve our enthusiastic driving
requirements that wouldn’t break the
bank in the process. We settled on a
5-speed sterling silver BMW Z4
convertible for our 1500 mile journey.
The Bimmer was rented from
Rent-A-Vette
of Las Vegas, NV, an agency that offers
high-line vehicles for hourly (ouch),
daily, or weekly rentals.
Besides being hideously expensive to
rent, we resisted our initial urges to
selecting a yellow Lamborghini Gallardo or
the "arrest-me-red" Ferrari 360 Modena for
the test as we really didn’t want to
attract that much attention, considering
our expected driving style. These
works-of-art look like they deserve a
speeding ticket while parked!
Driving Conditions/Style
While we don’t condone speeding, we
wanted to use these detectors in a
manner consistent with their intent - to
protect their drivers from would be
speeding tickets!
Of course, we applied
VEIL
to our rental vehicle lights in the
event we inadvertently stumbled upon a
laser speed trap and fortunately for us,
the car did not require a front license
plate.
As such we routinely cruised “in excess”
of posted limits and sometimes found our
speed to be occasionally north of the
“century mark.”
Granted,
rural areas of western states are a bit
more conducive to this sort of driving.
In other words, we wouldn’t necessarily
attempt driving as boldly in urban areas
and/or more populated states with more heavily
traveled roads - but we did want to
experience the full potential of these
great radar detectors.
Our Route
Red - Day 1, Blue - Day 2, Yellow - Day
3, Green - Day 4
Test Day #1 – 09 JAN 05 - (Las Vegas,
NV to Phoenix, AZ)
We departed one day early from the
international
Consumer Electronics Show -
where we show-cased the
VEIL
product-line in conjunction with
Blinder Xtreme's M-20 & M-40 laser jammers and
Xtreme Motorsportz -to begin our
test drive.
VEIL &
Blinder CES Crew
Our trip originated at
Michele's French Country Cottage,
the only bed & breakfast, of which we
are aware in Las Vegas, NV.
Michele was a wonderful hostess who
prepared fabulous breakfast cuisines
every morning for us during our stay for CES. If
you are looking for a quiet stay in
Vegas, this B&B is a must stay.
Veil Gal
& Michele
We got on the road at 0930 and
proceeded south on Route 93 towards the
Hoover Dam on our way to our first
destination – the outskirts of Phoenix,
AZ for a meeting with
Craig Peterson of
RadarTest.com, a leading radar detector
authority and automotive journalist.
Route 93S on way to Hoover Dam
On this initial testing day, we placed
all three radar detectors equally spaced
across the windshield. Our reason for
doing this was not to really compare the
radar detecting performance of each - in
an absolute sense - but more to get a
feel for the ergonomic differences that
exist between all three.
During this part of our trip there were
no encounters worth mentioning and again
all with three detectors all running
concurrently, we
would tend to discount absolute
performance in this environment.
We actually began to carefully examine
the performance capabilities in the
subsequent days of this comparison.
Overall they seemed to get along
together quite nicely - a testament to the
advanced shielding employed by these
radar detector designs.
During our visit with Craig, he gave our
set-up a look over and recommended, for
our driving route, to set the Ka
operation of the RX65 to USA mode. Who
were we to argue?
Test Day #2 – 10 JAN 05 - (Phoenix,
AZ to Tombstone, AZ)
We set off on the second leg of our trip
at 1345. At the time,
it was raining slightly and 57F. Our
trip odometer read 370 miles.
Rainy
Morning in Phoenix, AZ
Our first heads-up comparison was the
Bel RX65 Pro versus the Valentine One
v1.8 /wPOP2. There were no noteworthy
encounters other than a couple of “falses.”
Mr. &
Mrs. Veil Guy, Mr. & Mrs. RadarBusters & Crew
We caught up with
Radar Roy of Radar Busters at Wickenburg, AZ and got the
tour of his operation and met the
“crew.” Roy had provided us with some
useful directions which included an
incredibly scenic route towards southern
Arizona and our second destination.
Dusk at Vulture Mine
Road - South of Wickenburg, AZ
At a trip odometer reading of 431 miles,
we compared the RX65 (low driver side
mounting) to the 8500 X50 (low
center-passenger mounting). As we
were heading East on Interstate 8 the
RX65 alerted Ka for about 2 seconds then
alerted with two distinct POP alerts and
then another Ka alert at greater
strength around the Palo Verde Road
exit.
No visual ID of officer was
possible given the fact that it was dark, but it did feel like a real instant-on
trap. The X50 remained silent during
this encounter. Given the fact that we
couldn’t make the actual ID, no decisive conclusion could be made.
Later, traveling I-10 East approaching
stationary K-band at 24ghz speed
monitoring sign located on far side of
crest on highway located at the
perimeter of a road construction area
and facing us, the RX65 alerted approx
1-2 seconds before the x50 at 70-75mph.
We then switched out the X50 with the
Valentine One v1.8 w/POP2 to once again
compare it to the RX65 Pro. Our trip
reading at the time of this switch was
708 miles at the intersection of Route
80 and I-10E at the Benson
exit #303.
Approaching a small town with light
traffic at night, we visually identified a
police car on our side of roadway quite
a ways a way with its lights flashing. Shortly thereafter, the V1 alerted to Ka
about one second prior to the RX65 Pro
at a reported frequency of 35.507Ghz. During the encounter the V1 briefly lost
the signal while the RX65 continued
reporting to Ka band radar.
When got
close enough to make a valid ID, we saw
the that the patrol car was facing away
from us and situated behind a
pulled-over vehicle. As we passed the
patrol car, the V1 continued alerting to
Ka about 5-6 seconds longer from the
rear than the RX65 at a speed of about
35mph. This behavior was in keeping with
the fact that the V1 has an additional
rear-facing antenna.
Since we knew we had a legitimate radar
source, we turned vehicle around a ways
down the road and proceeded towards the
police car from the other direction. The
officer was out of site as the road had
a fairly sharp left bend to it. This
time, the RX65 alerted about one second
prior to the V1.
Our conclusion from this encounter was
that the detectors were equally quick in
alerting to this source and the slight
differences were likely attributed to
placement and field-of-view of each of
the detectors.
We turned around once more and continued
to our next destination for the evening
– the
Tombstone Sagebrush Inn located in historic
Tombstone, AZ.
Roger & Sue of the Sagebrush Inn -
Tombstone, AZ
Roger and Sue are the proprietors of the
Sagebrush and, as always, were a real pleasure to stay
with. Roger provides personalized tours
of the area and is a good source of the
local history and the locations of real
ghost towns that are located in southern
Arizona, like Gleeson.
Don’t forget to inquire about directions
to the John & Sandy Weber's
rattlesnake
crafts store and museum – run
out of a trailer on the outskirts of an authentic ghost
town.
We personally prefer
staying in the Doc Holiday room,
although
every room has its own distinct
personality. If
you ever visit Tombstone - site of the
famous gun fight - we recommend
staying here. It has a great western
feel to it. Roger & Sue serve hot coffee
and Danish every morning, outside by the
pool, as well as
interesting conversation. The
mornings are comfortably cool even
during the dead of summer and the air
quality is great. We make it a
point to stay there every time we visit
the area.
Test Day #3 – 11 JAN 05 - (Tombstone,
AZ to Sasabe, AZ)
We pulled up stakes at 1615 and
headed towards our next destination. The
temperature was 65F and it was somewhat
overcast. Trip miles at the start of
this segment were 736.
We continued with the comparison of the
RX65 (left middle) versus the V1 v1.8
(center-right middle)
On Route 82W towards Nogales, Mrs.Veil
Guy learned to drive a stick while I
took the notes.
At mm44, the RX65 briefly alerted to POP
radar. The V1 remained silent and there was no
sighting of a police cruiser at a trip odometer
reading of 763.3. Shortly thereafter,
the V1 alerted to very weak K-band radar from
the rear then to the sides
for a couple of cycles while the RX65
remained silent.
Approaching the small town of Sonita, AZ and a precipitous drop in the posted
speed limit we were alerted to an approaching police
cruiser ahead on the opposite side
using steady K-band.
The V1
alerted about 2-3 seconds before the
RX65 Pro at ~45mph. This was a real
trap. As we left the city limits, the V1
alerted twice ahead and once to the rear
with very weak K-band at mm30.
At mm27, the V1 alerted to a very weak
K-band from the rear for two cycles
while the RX65 remained silent.
Later, as we approached the town of
Patagonia at a speed of about 75mph, the
V1 alerted about five seconds prior to
the RX65 on steady K-band at a reported
24.176Ghz. The source was an approaching
unmarked police car in the opposite
lane. The town speed limit was reduced
to 30mph, which we obeyed.
In both of these proceeding
encounters, either detector would have
provided sufficient time to safely slow
down.
Two miles out of town, the V1 alerted
twice to a very weak K-band ahead while
the RX65 was silent. Followed by a brief
weak alert on K-band on the RX65 while
the V1 remained silent.
As we were approaching the city of
Nogales, the V1 alerted K-band at a
strength of three for about three
seconds. The RX65 did not alert
and no
police officer was spotted.
Dusk somewhere in Southern Arizona
Leaving the city limits of Nogales on
I19N traveling at about 60-70mph we got
a Ka alert at 34.708ghz on the RX65 six
seconds prior to the V1. We eventually
spotted the source which was a police
cruiser hiding in the median dividing
the highway just in front of an overpass
and facing us. Time of day was 1820 and
it was dark. Even though the RX65
alerted prior to the V1, either provided
plenty of time to slow down. To put this
into some context, the total warning
time we received to the trap location
was about 24 seconds traveling at
60-70mph.
Continuing on I-19N, we received a
K-alert on the V1 followed by a K-alert
on the RX65 by about one second while we
were traveling at about 75mph. The
source turned out to be a speed sign
located at a border patrol checkpoint. Again, either detector provided plenty
of time to react and slow down.
Security Checkpoint, I-19N North of
Nogales - Jose of US Border Patrol,
Sasabe, AZ
Later we met up with Jose, one of border
patrol officers working the seam of the
US and Mexico. He provided us directions to our final destination for
the evening. At this point, we were in a
very remote part of the state. No cell
phone coverage here.
Even here, the V1
alerted (falsed) with brief weak K-band
alerts while the RX65 Pro remained
silent. We turned off the RX65 to see if
it was contributing to this behavior and
although the V1 didn’t report any
additional K-band the remaining couple
of miles to our destination we weren’t
convinced that “crosstalk” was the
reason.
Note: We investigated this further
(running the V1 solo) and we still
encountered a relatively frequent
“false” rate of K-band.
At the conclusion of this day of driving,
it appeared the RX65 had a slight edge
over the V1 1.8 w/POP2 on Ka-Band (in Ka
USA mode) while the Valentine appeared
to have an edge over the RX65 in K-band
(at the expense of more frequent K-band
“falsings.”)
Again, in reality, either
would have provided plenty of time to
safely react and slow down to all of our
encounters today.
We arrived at our destination, the
Rancho de la Osa of Sasabe, AZ at
about 1930. It was very dark out and
quiet. Our dinner was waiting for us in
our room and we started a nice fire in
the room as the temperature in the
desert this time of year gets quite cold
in the evening.
Sunset at Sasabe & Cozy Warm Fire in
our Adobe-Styled Room.
Respite, 2nd Honeymoon - 12 JAN 05–14 JAN 05 (Sasabe,
AZ)
We stayed at the ranch for three days of
enjoying absolute piece and quiet. This
place was simply fabulous and we were
fortunate to have it all to ourselves –
no other guests were staying here at the
time.
We experienced awesome horseback rides
in this isolated part of the West. We
couldn’t help but feel a little like
a couple of City Slickers, but our two female
(Kim & Melanie) wranglers were much more pleasant to ride
with than the two characters in the
movie and although Curly wasn’t around,
Mike was every bit as good as the lead
wrangler - he's definitely a genuine
Marlboro man!
A Day on the Range of Southern Arizona
Every day we were treated to three
square gourmet meals by expert
chefs. The staff was a real pleasure to
stay with and Veronica (the Ranch owner)
was delightful. If you’re looking
for a place to stay away from the
crowds; want to “untwine your knots;”
and get a taste of the Wild West, we
highly recommended a visit. Be
forewarned, though, there’s no TV and no
cell-phone coverage.
Come to think of it - it's just what the
doctor ordered...
Veronica & Veil Gal -
Sacred
Baboquivari Mountains
Test Day #4, 14 JAN 05 – (Sasabe, AZ
to Las Vegas, NV)
If was Friday, sunny and the temperature
was 66F, our final leg of our trip out
West started at 906 miles on the trip
odometer. We set out towards Vegas from
the small town of Sasabe at 1325.
We began our comparison of both
Valentines - v1.8/POP2 versus v1.7. They
were separated by about 26 inches the
left-side was occupied with the v1.8 and
the right side was occupied with the
V1.7. Both were mounted high on the
windshield, but below any tint-strip.
While traveling on Route 86W the V1 v1.7
alerted about three to four seconds
prior to the V1 v1.8 to what turned out
to be an approaching cruiser operating
steady K-band although both offered
plenty of time to slow down to avoid
speed detection.
Later on this route the V1.8 alerted
prior to the V1.7 on Ka-band radar which
turned out to be a cruiser approaching
on the left opposing side of the road.
We encountered one more police cruiser
on this road. This time the V1.7 alerted
first to K-band at a signal strength of
two to three followed by the V1 v1.8 at
level one. Again, this turned out to be
an approaching cruiser operating with
steady K-band radar.
We briefly visited Kitt Peak National
Observatory but couldn’t stay as they
were closing at 1600 and we had a lot a
miles ahead of us. At 1620 we turned
around before reaching Ajo and headed
back east on Rt-86 towards Tucson, AZ.
Kitt Peak National Observatory.
Later on I-10W the detectors falsed
simultaneously to laser twice as the sun
was setting – once at 1700 and once at
1720. During this section of our
comparison, the V1 v1.8 falsed with very
weak K-band
radar quite a bit more than the V1 v1.7.
On I-10W approaching Phoenix, both
detectors alerted to a very strong blast
of Ka from the rear during a lane
changing / passing maneuver immediately
after an overpass. Fortunately for
us, there was some traffic, otherwise we
would have likely received a citation as
we were traveling at about 90mph at the
time both detectors went off.
Had it not been for the other traffic,
we would have been dead-meat.
Neither detector provided us with
advanced warning to what was obviously a
speed trap and no detector would have
likely provided us with advanced notice
as these officers were discriminating
and patient with their operation of
radar.
Something We Did Not Expect to See in
Southern Arizona
Even though the X50 and RX65 weren’t in
operation at the time, given the
strength of the radar, we are certain
they would have sounded their alerts as
well. The V1 with its arrows, did allow
us to quickly identify the source of the threat, although it wouldn’t
have made a bit of difference as we
immediately slowed down even before we
actually noticed the arrows.
Roy later confirmed that pulsed-Ka is
operated from the rear around Casa
Grande on I-10.
We then changed up the detectors and
mounted the V1 v1.8 on the left high
side and the 8500 X50 on the high right
side separated by about 26+ inches. Time
of day of the change was 1830.
Temperature was 63F and the evening was
clear. Miles accumulated so far were
1134.
In our first real radar encounter with
this match up, the X50 alerted 1st to
Ka-band radar at a reported 34.737Ghz by
about a second before the V1 v1.8 did. We felt the V1 v1.8 had the advantage as
it had a better line of sight to the
approaching vehicle on the other side of
the divided interstate even though it
alerted after the X50. Our speed was
about 80mph at time of contact. Both
provided ample notice to slow down
without detection.
We later received a brief false K alert
for two-three cycles on v1.8 while the
X50 stayed silent.
In the next real encounter, the V1 V1.8
alerted to Ka at 35.491Ghz about 0.5
seconds before the X50 which turned out
to be a police cruiser operating steady
Ka radar facing us with a car pulled
over on the opposite side of the
highway.
During this part of test, the 8500 X50
and the V1 1.8 performed virtually
identically and both offered impressive
performance.
As we made our way back towards
Wickenburg, AZ north on Vulture Mine
Road (and located in the middle of the
desert) the v1.8 “falsed” multiple times
to very weak K-band while the X50 remained silent. We had a good laugh –
even when we were in the middle of the
desert, the V1 alerted to K-band. What on
earth was it listening to? An
overhead satellite?
At 2000, we switched up our detectors.
This time we positioned the 8500 X50
left and high and the RX65 right and
high with about 26+ inches between them.
The temperate was about 50F, weather was
clear and the miles accumulated to this
point was 1226.
We called Roy, who promptly ordered us a
pizza! Thanks man, we were hungry! We
ate dinner with Roy and shared some of
our experiences.
We left Roy's place at 2137
on to our final leg of our Western route.
Miles at the time of our departure were
1251.
On Route 93N back towards the
Hoover Dam, we received a K-alert on the
RX65 at a reported 24.138Ghz about 0.5
seconds prior to the 8500 X50.
Shortly afterwards, the X50 alerted 1st
by a tick on K-band at 24.132Ghz. The
RX65 indicated the same source to be
operating at 24.122Ghz (they routinely
differed by 10mhz.) Turned out to be a
speed sign operating steady K-band radar
facing the opposite direction on the
other side of the road. After passing
the sign, the RX65 continued to report a
little longer than the X50.
Later the X50 alerted 1st to K-band at a
reported 24.132Ghz briefly before the
RX65 which indicated K-band at
24.122Ghz. As we suspected with our
previous encounter, it was another speed
sign this time facing us.
As we got closer to the Hoover Dam the
RX65 alerted 1st to K-band, at a
reported 24.140Ghz, by a tick before the
X50. This source too turned out to be
another speed sign facing the other
direction.
This back and forth repeated a couple of
more times as we continued north toward
Vegas on Route 93.
Shortly after we entered the state of
Nevada and continuing on our northerly
track to Las Vegas, both detectors
alerted to Ka-band simultaneously. No
visual confirmation could be made of the
source. Was this a case of
instant-on/pulsed radar? Perhaps.
Just before we exited off of Route 93 in
Vegas, we received a K-alert on the X50
for two cycles while RX65 remained
quiet.
We then received a false laser alert for
approximately 8 cycles from the RX65
while the X50 remained silent. We
attributed this last behavior to the
Vegas Skyline.
Conclusion of this match-up based upon
our experiences – the RX65 Pro and 8500 X50
provided nearly identical performance in
alerting to K and Ka radar.
Total miles accumulated at end of our trip in the
West were 1497.
Total speeding tickets accumulated were zero!
Way to go and a job well done with all
three (four) detectors. Up to this
point, we would have been entirely happy
with any of the three brands. They
all demonstrated that they were, for all
practical purposes, equally adept in
their primary function – to provide
enough advanced warning to radar so as
to allow their owners the time needed to
safely slow down.
The following morning we washed and returned our
rental vehicle and flew back home to the
Keystone State of PA.
Up to this point we had encountered some
instant-on and steady K and Ka radar
speed-traps
and no one detector consistently
performed better than the others.
We knew however, that our radar detector
comparison test was somewhat incomplete
as we did not test for X-band
sensitivity and/or laser performance. Before releasing the results of this
test we wanted to accumulate as much
experience as possible with these
detectors so we decided to hold-off on
publishing our findings so that we could
get some additional results with X-band
speed traps. And there is only one
place to go to get 'em…
Test Day #5, 05 FEB 05 – (PA, NJ, and
NY Route)
We set out to examine the performance of
each of these detectors on X-Band so we
headed to the only place where not only
is instant-on/pulsed X-band radar used,
it thrives and it is lethal! That place
is the Garden State of NJ. We selected a
route that would take us through some of
the most heavily patrolled areas in the
entire state, Interstate 78 in the north-western part of the state.
We initially compared the Bel RX65 Pro
to the Valentine One v1.8 (w/POP2) at 28
miles into our trip both radar detectors
alerted about the same time to a sign
with stationary K-band radar above
Quakertown, PA.
We proceeded on I-78 east towards NJ. At
31 miles into out trip the Valentine One
alerted to K-band about one second
sooner than the RX65 as we were
traveling about 85mph. The source was
another steady radar sign located in the
median around a left bend in the
interstate that was facing us.
Within three miles both the RX65 and the
V1 alerted K-band almost simultaneously
to another sign located in the median
facing away at the opposing lanes of
traffic after passing the source, the V1
alerted to rear K-band for about 2-3
seconds longer than the RX65.
When we reached the NJ state line, we
enabled X-band radar on both detectors
and re-confirmed that each were
set to
Highway sensitivity mode.
During this portion of our
test, we drove a little more
cautiously as compared to the West
because we knew we were swimming
in shark infested waters.
About six miles into the state on I-78E
the Valentine One briefly alerted to a
weak X-band signal about two seconds
prior to the RX65. We were traveling at
about 75-78mph at the time and could not
confirm the source although it was
likely a pickup of pulsed X-band radar usage.
These extremely well-trained radar
operators prove the adage that it is
not the equipment that counts – it’s how
you use it. NJ state troopers operate an
older (but still made) radar unit from
MPH Industries
– the in-car
K55 moving
radar unit. It operates on X-band in
either steady or pulsed-modes; when
either moving or stationery. The
K55 has
been in use in NJ for more than two
decades! No doubt this
equipment has been paid for several
thousand times over!
An all too familiar
site on this stretch of highway.
MPH, happens to be the maker of the
[relatively] new POP killer
BEE III. Don't let the marketing hype throw you,
though - radar detectors will not be
obsolete as it must be operated
in normal mode as legally required
to obtain your
vehicle
tracking history and thus, alerting
radar detectors in typical fashion.
The technology is pretty cool, but as
you will read, a well-trained radar
operator - regardless of
technology/radar band used - is more of a threat than a
"casual" or carefree POP user.
While driving on this interstate, a
radar detector will often alert to
X-band, but it can be very difficult to
locate the source and we eventually
found out the reason why. We had come
across a state police barracks located
just off the interstate that had a
patrol car that had left a K55 unit on.
During one of our approaches, we watched
and followed a trooper leave the
barracks and drive to what was,
obviously, a preferred speed trap
location.
In this particular trap, the trooper
positioned his vehicle on a very short
on-ramp to the interstate that was
obscured from view, from approaching
drivers, by an embankment and overpass
(see picture). You’ll notice that
the officer is actually pointing his
radar unit on a slight angle to the road
thus directing much of the low-power
radar across as opposed to following the
roadway.
Low-power
pulsed X-band K-55 from rear - 20+ yrs
old technology!
Concerned
about POP RADAR? No need. Plenty
of other lethal speedtraps lurking about.
Although this limits the actual
targeting distances (by design), it also
makes it much more difficult to detect
the signal regardless of the direction
of travel.
When this targeting method is combined
with an instant-on, pulsed mode, it
makes for extremely difficult detection
even with the best radar detector.
Bottom line:
be very mindful of your speeds when
driving on this interstate -especially when you consider that the
fines are doubled in [the state maximum
of] 65 mph speed zones in NJ.
Having found a legitimate X-band source,
we began an extensive comparison of the
radar detectors traveling both
directions, east and west-bound, on the
interstate.
In a heads-up comparison, the V1 alerted
between 0.5 to two seconds before the RX65
to the radar source.
The surprise came with the Escort 8500
X50 / Valentine and Escort 8500 X50 /
RX65 Pro match-ups.
On a westerly approach to the barracks,
the V1 alerted a full five seconds prior
to the X50 while we were traveling at
about 40mph. We ran this test several
additional times to confirm this
outcome.
At highway speeds of about 80mph on I-78E
the X50 didn’t report the presence of
the radar where the V1 did. On the
return trip I-78W (the barracks was on
this side of the interstate) the V1
alerted about 0.5 to 1 second before the
8500 X50.
We repeated the test between the RX65
and the V1 and both alerted almost
simultaneously when the orientation of
the radar detectors was similar.
In an RX65 versus 8500 X50 match-up, the
RX65 alerted about nine seconds before
the X50 at 65mph.
Just to be as complete as possible, we
compared both versions of Valentines
v1.7 versus v1.8. The v1.7 consistently
alerted about 0.5-two seconds prior to
the v1.8 on this X-band radar source.
Having compared all of the detectors to a
known legitimate X-band radar source, we
continued on our planned driving route
towards the great state of NY. Our route
took us North on I-287 to the I-87 North
(the New York Thruway). We proceeded to
Exit 17 (Newburgh) in the Catskill region
as our farthest point traveled today.
On our return on I-87 South the V1
alerted first by about 0.5-1 second to a
state trooper’s steady Ka radar unit
in-car unit facing our direction as we
approached exit 16.
Once back in the state of NJ we decided
to change our return route to include
I-80 west towards the Delaware Water Gap
in north-eastern PA and lucky for us, we
did.
At 1730, it was dusk and getting quite
dark and with 23 miles to go before
reaching the PA state line, we thought
we spotted a state trooper positioned in
the median. As I was expecting a radar
shot, I nearly suffered a heart
attack when both the RX65 and V1 alerted
simultaneously to Laser!
Targeting occurred at approximately 1000
feet from the trooper.
I was traveling about 75-78 mph at the
time of the alert and immediately slowed
to about 65mph.
Fortunately, the vehicle I was driving
had a thorough
VEIL
treatment! I felt reassured that we were able to safely slow down without
being ticketed!
I thought we had to drive
to Ohio to test the laser function of
these detectors, but found out the hard
way - that despite its inauspicious
beginnings in the state legal system, laser is
now alive and well in
NJ!
I proceeded to the next exit, turned
around to go through the laser speed
trap again – this time with the 8500 X50
in place of the RX65. By the time I got
back to the trap, the officer had a
vehicle already pulled over. Too
bad, he wasn’t using VEIL!
Another hapless motorist who has not, as
yet, heard of Veil.
I should point out that neither the RX65
nor the V1 provided any advanced warning
to the laser speedtrap – not surprising
given the nature of laser.
We completed the remainder of our
return-trip with no subsequent
radar/laser encounters.
Miles accumulated today were 500
bringing the total of our test to about
2000 during five full driving days and
through five states and having faced all
forms of radar / laser bands currently
in use today in North America.
Test Day #6, Evening/Early Morning of 19-20 FEB 05 –
(Philadelphia to Atlantic City and Back)
At the last minute, Mr. & Mrs. Veil
Guy got a hold of a pair of front row
seats to a
Brooks and Dunn concert at
the Taj Mahal Hotel and Casino located
at Atlantic City, NJ. Since our
route was going to take us on the
Philadelphia corridor to the shore - the
Atlantic City Expressway - which is also
replete with NJ state police, we figured we update our
report to include any additional radar
encounters.
We
set-up [what turned out to be] our favorite
pair of radar detectors - the
Beltronics RX 65 Pro (low and center)
and the Valentine v1.8 (low and left).
We
set out at around 1830 local time and
proceeded to our venue without any
noteworthy
incidents; it was on our return trip
when the "fun" began.
At
0045, we were headed east and north back
towards Philadelphia approaching the end
of the AC expressway at the point the
expressway merges into Route 40
North. At this time, both detectors
alerted at the same time to X-band and
then both went silent. A few
seconds later, both alerted again for
several more seconds and at a somewhat
greater signal strength.
On and off they went several more times
in unison as we made our way onto Route
40 towards the Ben Franklin Bridge.
Our expectations of an approaching
instant-on radar trap were confirmed
about 20 seconds later when we spotted
the trooper in the median facing us and
selectively targeting on-coming
vehicles. During the last
eight seconds of the trap, both
detectors alerted with strong signals.
We were traveling at about 75-80mph at the
time of our contact and slowed down to a
more reasonable 65mph as we passed the
speed trap.
An interesting observation was made
concerning the Valentine: for some
finite period of time, it indicated that
the source was coming from behind
us. Which is to say, that the directional
arrows can sometimes be "wrong" or
misleading at
indicating from where the real threat
is coming. This was most
likely due to a rear reflection of the
radar beam from the trailing traffic/objects.
This experience demonstrated, once again, that the Valentine
requires a bit more driver involvement
to properly interpret what
information is actually being
conveyed. Something one gets used
to doing, after living with this detector
for an extended period, and am in no way
being critical of this behavior, either
- merely pointing out a fact.
Within
another minute of passing this trap both
detectors again briefly alerted
simultaneously with another X-band
alert. We initially though this
was coming from the trap we just passed
only to find that both detectors again
alerted with a stronger X-band
signal and the Valentine correctly
identified the source as from being ahead. This suggested that we
were approaching another radar
source which turned out to be another
real speedtrap. This time, facing
away from us - the trooper was again in
the median targeting the opposing southbound
traffic. Total time to trap from
initial alert was about 10 seconds at
approximately 78mph.
Wow!
Two traps back-to-back within the time
span of about a minute. Both were
instant-on pulsed types, and both
detectors essentially dead-heated
and provided us with plenty of time to
to safely slow down [to either one] to
avoid yet another speeding ticket!
Schuylkill Expressway
Leaving the "City of Brotherly Love"
We felt these good experiences merited
an addition to our travel log.
We racked up another 200 some odd miles
to our drive.
Conclusions
Placing your trust into a radar detector
takes time and requires a lot of
driving time behind the wheel and a
proven historical track-record with a
variety of different speed trap
encounters.
If you skipped to this
section without reading the detailed
findings, you may have missed an aspect
of particular radar detector that you
may find especially appealing.
We concluded that small differences (a
second or so at highway speeds)
were not statistically significant and
were more likely attributed to the
actual placement of the detectors and
their respective fields-of-view.
Most windshields have a distinct curve
to them When we compared two
detectors we often spaced them apart
about 20 or more inches to minimize
cross-interference. This had the
effect of subtly changing the
field-of-view of the antennae.
Detectors mounted on the driver’s side
tended to face to the left, detectors
mounted center tended to face straight,
and detectors mounted on the passenger
side tended to face to the right.
The location of the radar source and curvature of
the road [relative to each detector] had
an impact upon the alert
quickness of each. That’s why
we often turned around and tested them
again on the return, when we encountered
known legitimate radar sources - to
confirm this phenomenon. Throughout this
comparison, we mixed up the relative
positioning of each the detectors on the
windshield vertically and horizontally.
That being said after six days of
driving, the accumulation of about 2300
miles and a very good number of speed
trap encroachments in five states - one
fact can safely be asserted: Bottom line
- all three of these radar detectors are
truly stellar performers and we have
yet to encounter a real speed trap that
any of these detectors weren’t up to the
task of providing the maximum level of
protection that a detector is capable of
providing today.
The days of Valentine’s sheer dominance,
in this regard, are history and that’s
really straight talk.
This is not to say that we didn’t have
our preferences. We did.
For the most
part, though, these preferences were
more tied to an individual radar detector "personality"
than merely performance differences. Our
preferences may not be the same as yours and that’s
why we went into such detail about the
many different aspects of each radar
detector so that you could arrive at
your own informed opinion/conclusion.
False Rates / Alerts from Unconfirmed
Sources
The Escort 8500 X50 appeared to false
the least during our drive, followed
closely by the RX65 Pro which was also
quiet, overall, and then the
Valentine v1.8 /w POP2. As we already
mentioned, the V1 tended to false on
K-band even in rural areas. The V1 v1.7
was devoid of this behavior and falsed
only somewhat more than the RX65.
All were tested at maximum sensitivity
during the duration of this entire test
and were configured to alert to the
following - K, Ka, POP, Laser.
Other than in NJ, X-band was disabled on
all three (four) and Ku band was
disabled [on the RX65 and newer
Valentine One] for the entire duration.
Our venerable V1’s stellar performance
was somewhat diminished by a greater
propensity to “falsing” [particularly on
K band]. We originally thought it was
attributed to greater sensitivity but
later felt that this tendency may be
rooted in software because the V1 did
not consistently demonstrate superior
performance [to either the RX65 or X50]
when encountering real K-band radar
threats. An answer to this
behavior may be coming from the
manufacturer and we will keep you
posted, if and when it does.
We should also note that the Valentine
falsed the least on Ka-band relative to the other two detectors and
in the
summer season - Its been suggested
to us - that this may
become more pronounced as there
will tend to be an increase of "cheap"
radar detectors on the road as people do
more vacation traveling. We'll
have to wait and see...
The fact that it has two antennae - one
front and one rear - tended to increase
the falsing rates. It should be noted
that the older V1 was much quieter and
more in line with two
the other detectors. It is also important to
point out the K-band falsing didn’t
appreciably diminish when POP - the "J"
function - was
disabled, either. At any rate, we
hope this behavior can
and will be programmed out, in time, by
the manufacturer.
Performance / Alert Quickness to
Bona-fide Radar/Laser Sources
All three brands offered very similar
performance in alerting to bona-fide
speed traps.
There was one exception to this and that
was X-band sensitivity during the NJ
driving route. Here the Valentine V1 and Bel
Pro RX65 performed virtually
identically. For some reason, the Escort
8500 X50 seemed to lag a bit as
compared to the other two. If we drove
routinely in NJ, this may become more
of an issue and we would feel a bit more
secure with either the RX65 or V1.
Perhaps it was a production variance;
too aggressive filtering/signal
rejection (remember they were all set to
highway mode); the fact that we operated
two detectors in the vehicle (even
though they were spaced far apart), we
don’t know – but it was the one
noteworthy surprise. If your driving
doesn’t take you to NJ and you know that
X-band isn’t used in your area then this
is a non-issue.
We still love the arrows, on
either Valentine, in
assisting with identifying a passing
“threat” and we have been accustomed to
them for well over a decade. But,
we did not specifically encounter a
speed trap, during this test, where they
would have made a substantive difference
- which is not to say that there aren’t
specific conditions, where they may
have. And on occasion - as
evidenced on our driving route of day
six - they may be misleading, requiring
proper interpretation.
The older model has aged
especially well and continues to dazzle
us with reliable top-shelf performance.
Other than not having the newer POP nor
Ku capabilities, this detector is still
an incredible performer and we
really wouldn'tfeel any less protected
driving with it [in the states] as
compared to the newer detectors.
"No POP," you say? "So what," we
say - troopers should be using the
standard operational mode of the BEE
III anyway so that they can legally
issue tickets and until the day that POP
can be used in that manner (we doubt
that'll ever happen) its more about marketing
hype than a real threat. Is
POP capability nice? Sure, but
this detector still remains a
benchmark by which [all] other
radar detectors (including the V1 v1.8)
are judged.
This older model only
slightly lagged in Ka-band
sensitivity to its younger brother, the
V1.8 and appeared just slightly quicker
with X and K-band radar. - an
incredible accomplishment given
that it's almost two decades
old! No doubt, that's why they
continue to
fetch a premium on
E-bay. For its time (come to
think of it, for all time), it truly is
an engineering marvel!
If your looking for the
maximum sensitivity and are willing to tolerate a noticeable
increase of K-band "falsing"
rates - with this particular version
- and/or require directional
information about the radar source, then
the Valentine One still stands alone.
In our opinion, Valentines aren't really
designed for the casual radar
detector user - requiring more
involvement from its owner to interpret
its behavior.
Other than the X-band performance, the
RX65 Pro and 8500 X50 were essentially
interchangeable. So any
decision would have to made on your
perceptions of the findings reported
here.
A tremendous amount of thought has gone
into the design of the Beltronics RX65
Pro and it shows.
Ergonomically, the Bel RX65 was superior
-
we loved the quick re-programming
ability, the volume levels obtainable, band
audio clarity, its smaller size, the
overall quietness of operation [lack of falsing]
even on highway mode, that it
can be operated in Dark Mode, provided remote volume adjustment with
audio assistance -at a touch of a button
[on the lighter plug] and that changes
to operation are accompanied by
textual/tonal confirmation and most
importantly that is was consistently
quick at alerting to approaching threats
regardless of the radar / laser used.
The fact that is has the added
capability to detect Ku radar - which
has been in use in Europe for quite some
time and may soon be making its
appearance stateside, is a real plus.
Each detector has its own
distinctive
flavor and each has its rightful
place
in the marketplace.
Our Overall Preference
Throughout these tests, we found
ourselves favoring the comparison of
both the RX65 Pro and V1.
And, in fact, although it’s not
practical for most, we enjoyed driving
with both detectors in operation – they
appeared to get along quite nicely. If one alerted while the other remained
silent, we would feel more assured that
we could disregard the alert. If
both alerted, we were more inclined to
react immediately. This too,
applied to our match-ups of the V1 and
8500 X50.
Taking everything into consideration -
factoring both performance and
ergonomics - if we had only to pick one
radar detector
to take with us on our trip, it would be
the Beltronics RX65 Pro.
We think Beltronics has struck a wonderful
balance between absolute performance,
ergonomic friendliness, and "fresh"
packaging.
Now,
what's your preference?
We will discuss our findings, with our
readers, on the
radardetector.net forum. Your participation is welcomed and we’ll
provide updates when deemed appropriate.
We have invited each of the
manufacturers to provide
commentary in response to this
article and will include them in our
review as we receive them.
We wish you safe motoring!
Bob & Lisa (aka: The Veil Guy & Veil
Gal)
Veil Guy & Veil Gal Renew Wedding Vows
in Vegas - 08 JAN 05
If you find this review informative,
please provide us a link using the
following html snippet:
The Ultimate <i>Real-World</i>
<a href="http://www.laserveil.com/en/ultimate-radar-detector-review-05/introduction/">Radar
Detector</a> Review 2005.
We will provide a reciprocal link upon
request.
Epilogue I -
08 FEB 05
-Remaining Questions / Possible
Explanations
Escort 8500 X50 (Decreased X-Band
Sensitivity)
We were a little baffled by the
apparent diminished X-band performance
of the X50 so we decided to set out late
one evening to try to ascertain the
reason as to this detector’s behavior.
I am pleased to report that I think we
found it.
We located a verifiable source of X-band
and K-band radar and we spent a
considerable amount of time making
approaches in both directions to these
sources with all three detectors and
this is what we came up with:
We found that when the Escort 8500 X50
has its Ka-band circuitry enabled, the
detector’s apparent sensitivity to
X-band radar noticeably diminished. K-band performance did not appear
adversely affected, though. When we
disabled Ka reception, the detector
appeared somewhat quicker overall to
alerting weak radar signals.
To be complete, we tried all of the Bel
RX65 Pro ‘s Ka settings – USA,
International, OFF. As with the X50, the
performance of K-band didn’t appear
adversely affected by any of these
settings. But, we may have noticed a
very slight (and we do mean very slight)
reduction in X-band sensitivity when Ka
was set to either USA or International
modes.
We went a step further with the X50 and
we repeated the approaches a number of
times again - with Ka enabled - but at very slow speeds and
we were able to detect the X-band source
at almost the same distances when having
the Ka function disabled completely. This led us to believe, that perhaps the
X50’s sensitivity wasn’t really
affected, but the speed in which the
detector may report an initial weak
X-band source, may be.
We got to thinking, since a radar
detector is essentially a specialized
scanner and as Ka-band radar is quite
wide, perhaps the X50 is favoring or is
pre-occupied scanning this region at a
slight expense of weak initial off-axis X-band
detection.
We say this because once the
X50 locked onto the X-band radar source,
it tended to hold onto it even if we
came to a complete stop and reversed
backwards past the point where the
detector initially alerted (and farther
from the source.) The difference
in speed was less apparent when the
detector had a better line of sight to
the source.
Again, if you don’t drive in the state
of NJ or any other place where X-band is
known to be operated, this is merely
academic. We did want to get to the
bottom of it, though and I am pleased
that we did. We believe that Escort can
likely program this behavior anomaly
out. The firmware version indicated, on
the detector during the reset operation, was 5.
Epilogue II - 10 FEB 05
-Remaining Questions / Possible
Explanations
Valentine One (V1) v1.8 w/ POP2 (Propensity to
K [and X] Falsing)
Shortly after we conducted the series of
X-band sensitivity tests on the X50, we
got to thinking about the propensity of
the new Valentine to “false” on both
X-band and K-band relative to the both
the RX65 and X50 even when they were set
to highway mode.
During our real-encounters, we did not
see a consistently appreciable
difference in quickness to alerting to
approaching K-band (or X-band) radar
than either of the other detectors. We got to thinking about what would
contribute to the increased alerts from
the latest Valentine unit and then
formulated an idea that we may have been
able to confirm in the field.
On 10 Feb 05, we set out to the same
X-band source we used to identify the
effect that Ka-band enabling had on the
Escort 8500 X50. Once again we made our
approach very slowly with both the RX65
and the V1.
The V1 alerted just a little
before the RX65. We immediately stopped
our vehicle and then slowly panned the RX65
from about 45 degrees off-axis to the
left of our car to about 45 degrees
to the right of the vehicle. At about
30 degrees to the left, the RX65
alerted to X-band. This suggested to us
that there may be more than sheer
sensitivity contributing to this
phenomenon.
We repeated this test
several times which led us to this
conclusion: what we may be dealing with
is the equivalence of a greater field-of-view of
the V1 versus the other detectors and
not just a sensitivity / filtering issue.
It appears the V1
considers a wider
field-of-view, of off-axis weak radar
signals as potential radar threats, than
do the other detectors. This added
ability, may be
contributing to the greater alert / falsing
rates of both X and K bands. Since
the V1 has two antennae and is able to alert to weak radar from the
side this may serve to compound this
tendency.
In our opinion, during highway driving,
this “extra-wide” field-of-view may not
be completely practical as distant
radar signals from speed traps farther
ahead, tend to come within relatively
more narrow fields-of-view, front or
rear – of course we are not considering
rare legitimate radar side-reflections.
If our analysis is correct, perhaps
Valentine would consider developing an
operating mode which would selectively
narrow, somewhat, their detector’s
field-of-view to cut-down on the initial
alerting to radar sources from the more
extreme angles. This additional
mode could behave somewhat like the
X-band Advanced Logic mode but
with K-band.
Once locked on to any given radar
source, the detector could alert, as it
normally does, to the sides and rear
during the passing of the source.
This may be accomplished without
actually decreasing sensitivity and / or
modifying filtering algorithms.
On the other hand, providing the ability
to selectively decrease sensitivity to
K-band falsing (like the advanced-logic
mode) may result in the same outcome.
In either event, it would be the
equivalent of taking an ultra-wide angle
lens of 14mm and zooming to a more “normal”
40mm or, at least, bring the behavior
more in line with the previous 1.7
version.
Credits
We would like to thank Radar Roy of
Radar Busters whose company sponsors an informative online
discussion forum at
radardetector.net -
a forum, in which we have the pleasure of
participating. Without his support, this
review could not have taken place.
Additionally,
I would like to personally thank
Craig
Peterson, of
RadarTest.com,
for his thoughtful review of our radar
detector set-up and configuration and
his suggestions for their operation.
Subsequent
to this test, I learned that Craig had
participated in the legendary
Cannon
Ball Baker Sea-to-Shining-Sea Memorial
Trophy Dash races when radar
traffic enforcement was at its nascent
stages - in the days when men were
men. And to think, I was among
royalty and didn't even
know it!
If
you find the information provided herein
worthwhile in assisting you making a
purchasing decision, please support
Radar Busters or participate in their
online forum.
And while I am on the subject, I want to
extend a special thanks to certain
members of this forum - you know who you
are - for their contributions and
assistance in proof-reading this review
and pointing out any oversights on our
part.
The Veil Guy
Useful Links
Independent Review(s) of Veil
Speed Zones –
A trustworthy source of radar detector,
laser jammers, and other equipment
reviews.
Professional Reviewers
If you still desire more review
information please visit online either
of these eminently qualified sources -
each presented in their own distinctive
manner and with their own methodology.
RadarTest.com –
Reliable source of equipment and
automotive reviews provided by "royalty."
Speed
Measurement Labs –
A trustworthy source of equipment
reviews and traffic safety information.
Manufacturers
Beltronics –
Manufacturer of the RX65 Pro and other
electronic equipment.
Escort -
Manufacturer of the 8500 X50 and other
equipment.
Valentine -
Manufacturer and direct seller of the V1
radar detector.
Blinder
X-TREME USA –
Master Distributor
of VEIL products.
Online
RadarBusters –
Dependable online retailer of Bel,
Blinder, Escort, and VEIL laser
countermeasure products.
RadarDetector.net –
Online forum of all things related to
equipment and speed enforcement.
Trip Related
Little Church of the West
- Historic Wedding Chapel of Las Vegas, NV.
Michele's French Country Cottage
- Fabulous Bed & Breakfast Located at Las
Vegas, NV.
Rancho de la Osa
- Dude Ranch Located at Sasabe, AZ.
Rattlesnake Crafts
- Unique Craft Shop & Museum Located on
Outskirts of a Ghost Town.
Tombstone Sagebrush Inn
- South-Western Style Lodging Located at
Historic Town.
Web Related
mozilla
-
Open Source Effort for Next Generation
Internet-related Software.
W3C
-
World Wide Web Consortium.
|