Epilogue I -
08 FEB 05
-Remaining Questions / Possible
Explanations
Escort 8500 X50 (Decreased X-Band
Sensitivity)
We were a little baffled by the
apparent diminished X-band performance
of the X50 so we decided to set out late
one evening to try to ascertain the
reason as to this radar detector’s behavior.
I am pleased to report that I think we
found it.
We located a verifiable source of X-band
and K-band radar and we spent a
considerable amount of time making
approaches in both directions to these
sources with all three radar detectors and
this is what we came up with:
We found that when the Escort 8500 X50
has its Ka-band circuitry enabled, the
radar detector’s apparent sensitivity to
X-band radar noticeably diminished. K-band performance did not appear
adversely affected, though. When we
disabled Ka reception, the >b?radar detector
appeared somewhat quicker overall to
alerting weak radar signals.
To be complete, we tried all of the Bel
RX65 Pro ‘s Ka settings – USA,
International, OFF. As with the X50, the
performance of K-band didn’t appear
adversely affected by any of these
settings. But, we may have noticed a
very slight (and we do mean very slight)
reduction in X-band sensitivity when Ka
was set to either USA or International
modes.
We went a step further with the X50 and
we repeated the approaches a number of
times again - with Ka enabled - but at very slow speeds and
we were able to detect the X-band source
at almost the same distances when having
the Ka function disabled completely. This led us to believe, that perhaps the
X50’s sensitivity wasn’t really
affected, but the speed in which the
radar detector may report an initial weak
X-band source, may be.
We got to thinking, since a radar
detector is essentially a specialized
scanner and as Ka-band radar is quite
wide, perhaps the X50 is favoring or is
pre-occupied scanning this region at a
slight expense of weak initial off-axis X-band
detection.
We say this because once the
X50 locked onto the X-band radar source,
it tended to hold onto it even if we
came to a complete stop and reversed
backwards past the point where the
radar detector initially alerted (and farther
from the source.) The difference
in speed was less apparent when the
radar detector had a better line of sight to
the source.
Again, if you don’t drive in the state
of NJ or any other place where X-band is
known to be operated, this is merely
academic. We did want to get to the
bottom of it, though and I am pleased
that we did. We believe that Escort can
likely program this behavior anomaly
out. The firmware version indicated, on
the radar detector during the reset operation, was 5.
<Prev
Next>
Print
Friendly
© Copyright MMV Veil
Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
|